This is for every teacher who refuses to be blamed for the failure of our society to erase poverty and inequality, and refuses to accept assessments, tests and evaluations imposed by those who have contempt for real teaching and learning.
Reading is great, joining is better - please sign in. For BATs, by BATs, we do not sell data!
BAT Store
Click image for link
We have now gotten a US Made and Union shop to sell us BAT shirts in all designs at a low cost.
Bumper stickers are coming soon and we hope to add more shirt types (tank, polo) if there is interest in the t-shirts!
Seriously looking for the differences between the two. Is it mostly that the local BOE oversees Magnet Schools and the Charters have the 'special BOE', with a line to the Executive or is it different with each state?
Thank you,
Nikk
BAT Forum Administrator, BAT Facebook Moderator, and proud BAT and DCBAT Member
Magnet schools have a focus, like arts or science. Charters may or may not. Magnet schools are staffed by certified teachers. Charters may of may not. Magnets are in predominantly minority neighborhoods housed in "rough" areas. Charters are in quiet suburban well-landscaped areas. Magnets must have at least 51% of their students from the nearby community (therefore minority and low SES) while charters can pick and choose their students. Magnets have the same admin as regular public schools and adhere to the same policies as others in the district. Charters are their own entities.
Post by I'd rather be cruisin' on Aug 16, 2013 19:09:47 GMT -5
In my area the magnets (we have three: a k-5, a K-8 and a HS) are totally part of our public school district...all are affluent and choose students based on a lottery or a portfolio. The elementary magnet is a "micro society" and "fine arts" magnet so a student's talent portfolio (singing, dance, art) could get the child in. Our two charters are funded with public money but have no lottery (they can select whomever they want to attend) and the administration and board are not answerable to our Board of Ed (which the magnet is). Both forms of schools require a contract from the parents to volunteer and be actively involved. The magnet principals hire school personnel from the district and those administrators are selected by our superintendent. Our superintendent and BOE have no oversight on the hiring of staff or administrators at the charter schools. On the recent school grade debacle in our state, surprisingly (sarcasm), only our magnets and charters maintained their previous "A" grades while every other school in my district dropped a letter grade from the previous year.
36 years in Public education. 9 years in self contained K-12 Hearing Impaired class; 4 years in self-contained K-5 SLI class (severe language impaired); 23 years SLP, the last 6 years in Middle and High schools.
That is quite interesting, IRBC. DC has, basically, that format.
One question - since magnets pull resources away from traditional, neighborhood, schools, are they not sort of a 'charter-lite' or, because many standards are the same, and students 'count' for the District, are they a better option?
See, something like NYSE BOCES-run technical programs, for those not college-bound, is quite appealing, at least to me. Students attend their main school for English, Math, Science, and then get their electives, perhaps cosmetology, auto-repair, et al, through BOCES. That appears to be a bit better model than totally separate schools, especially for-profit ones!
Trying to come up with a sort of proposal to combat the Charter vampirism - and that is beyond me, but hopefully some of us can come together with one that BATs can fully support.
Nikk
BAT Forum Administrator, BAT Facebook Moderator, and proud BAT and DCBAT Member
The biggest thing about charters is the fact that they are 'not answerable to the board of ed', even though they are allocated resources from the school district.
I'm sure my school admin would love to have that kind of autonomy.
Here in Arizona, charter schools are most certainly answerable to the AZ Board of Ed, which is why so many schools (at least in Tucson) are on the verge of being shut down due to the crappily-run programs on the primarily poor sides of town.
On the other hand, there are also charters in better neighborhoods. These consist of schools that skim the cream of the crop off the ever-shrinking middle class. Thanks to its ability to vet while at the same time saying, ""We accept everyone on a random lottery basis!", one school here ranks nationally. A second is widely known as "the Christian charter school." (The admin makes it clear up-front, and there's a freshly-built church adjacent to the freshly-built campus.)
That said, I'd be lying if I said I don't regularly dream about starting my own charter school, where I could teach what I thought was important to at-risk kids without all the bullshit that goes on in the massive, bureaucratically nightmarish district that is Tucson Unified, or in the nepotistic, shamelessly corrupt, public-gone-corporate district that is Sunnyside.
Our magnet schools are true magnets. They are designed to draw the higher SES, white and Asian families to poor neighborhoods. They benefit the community as a whole. They have the same source of primary funding (some get more grants than regular schools) and are held to the same standards.
Theory is that with the more involved and financially stable parents in the school, ALL the students will do better. It has shown to be true.
Our magnet schools are true magnets. They are designed to draw the higher SES, white and Asian families to poor neighborhoods. They benefit the community as a whole. They have the same source of primary funding (some get more grants than regular schools) and are held to the same standards.
Theory is that with the more involved and financially stable parents in the school, ALL the students will do better. It has shown to be true.
Adding... But a key difference in all of the parents is that with magnet schools, like charters, there is at least enough parental involvement to get the kids enrolled into the programs.