This is for every teacher who refuses to be blamed for the failure of our society to erase poverty and inequality, and refuses to accept assessments, tests and evaluations imposed by those who have contempt for real teaching and learning.
Reading is great, joining is better - please sign in. For BATs, by BATs, we do not sell data!
BAT Store
Click image for link
We have now gotten a US Made and Union shop to sell us BAT shirts in all designs at a low cost.
Bumper stickers are coming soon and we hope to add more shirt types (tank, polo) if there is interest in the t-shirts!
I have not been is a classroom for a long time. So I am asking for experts' opinions about the topic of cursive writing. I read an article online today about the pros and cons of students' need for learning cursive in this digital age. I spent hours practicing cursive writing in school. Granted, I was taught by nuns and was afraid not to have perfect writing. But before I worked for the state affiliate of the NEA, I taught 5th grade and we still had handwriting class. Technology was not around during the time I taught in a classroom, so my frame of reference is skewed. People of my generation tend to use what they did as the standard for what is acceptable today, and often that is just plain wrong. Some in the article expressed the need for a student to learn to read cursive, but not the need for the student to learn to write cursive. Others were entirely for the need or against the need. May I know what you think?
It's my opinion that cursive writing was invented, not to speed writing or make it easier, but rather was invented to use with quill/nib/fountain pens. I'm probably the last generation that learned to write cursive with a nib pen, and even then it was because my third grade teacher was old fashioned. Writing with a nib pen is more of an exercise in 'painting' with ink than with continuous writing. A connected form of writing was needed when this was the case, thus cursive was born. We now use gel or ballpoint pens, and it is a rarity to see a fountain pen. Indeed, I was never good at writing, and once I learned to touch type in ninth grade, I gave up on cursive and handwriting as much as I could at the time. When I have to write on the board or hand write a message, I usually just print.
We now have keyboards that are almost completely silent, and unlike handwriting, writing faster does not affect legibility, and so is a distinct advantage, even if we type on smartphones using only our thumbs.
Actually, I have a great love for cursive and when I taught elementary school, I loved teaching it. My son just finished 3rd grade and the teachers told the parents that they would be learning cursive AND keyboarding. Learning cursive involved sending a few worksheets home in the homework packet for a few weeks. They were letters in isolation with NO instruction at all. Needless to say, they did not learn cursive and I wouldn't be so angry about it if they actually DID learn keyboarding but they actually did neither. I believe the stress over test scores and the incessant test prep prevented the teachers from teaching either of them. Frustrating!
Post by Michelle Ramey on Aug 18, 2013 10:05:37 GMT -5
We teach it in 3rd in my district. My students LOVE learning it! They actually write a lot nicer than when they print. I know it's not a tested subject so I can see how it can get phased out in many places.
I love teaching it and seeing the excitement on my students' faces when they finally get how to write the letters.
2nd Grade Teacher {WA State}, taught 5th, 3rd, and I subbed for a bit, this is my 9th year teaching.
Post by ladywclass on Aug 18, 2013 10:44:14 GMT -5
I do think for students who have not yet mastered the keyboard and are able to write fluently that way ... (key word is fluently!) ... that the act of writing cursive can help them get the flow of words down more easily than the disjointed manuscript writing (which is a fairly recent invention in the scheme of things). I believe there is some research to back this up but I've misplaced it at the moment! (Shall I do as the 'reformers' do and make some up?)
Elem spec ed, 29th year (also gen ed, g/t, college experience) Indiana & Texas
Personally, I do not teach cursive. I would much rather teach the students to write print properly, especially when I have so many kids who write things like "soaP". It drives me NUTS that those "letter tails" (as I call them) are not done properly. I can see a need for learning to read cursive, even in a tech age, because of the many kinds of fonts available. But not to write it. That's my 2 cents.
Post by librarylady on Sept 8, 2013 17:35:46 GMT -5
It has been phased out at my school -- no time to teach it because of mandated instructional minutes & curriculum. I think it is sad. Many of my students try and learn it on their own. Every year I give them a copy of our AUP (Acceptable Use Policy) that requires a "signature". That's when I find out who even knows what a signature is these days. I realize that these days everything is digital (and gosh knows I love my toys) but really? What are they going to do when they have a legal document that requires a signature? Are we going back to marking an "X"? Just my two cents! For what it's worth, my district doesn't teach keyboarding either, yet students are expected to type long responses to writing "prompts" on timed tests. Makes me wonder if anyone making policies actually has any functioning brain cells.